Me and the Pedophile Piper of Phish

The day that I met Jon Fishman started at the Northport dump. I was approached by an older white-haired hippie that was a caretaker for the great American artist Neil Wellever’s estate. I forget the guy’s name unfortunately, but he was a fixture on that land and was deeply traumatized to be uprooted after spending so many years there planting trees, etc.
“Would you go over there and make sure that the new owners don’t burn down the place. They’re really flaky.”
Neil Wellever had set the cedar shingles on fire with his uncleaned chimney.
“The new owner is the drummer for Phish”.
I pulled up their 8/10ths of a mile driveway and Jon Fishman himself ambled out to my truck wearing brightly colored PJ bottoms tucked into green Gumby boots, shirtless and wearing a rain coat. I’m not making this up. The only thing missing was a nervous looking sheep, and just then some sheep walked into view.
“Could you come back and clean the chimneys some other time so I can watch you? I’d like to learn how to do it”. Of coarse I said yes.
“Briar would like to show you around the place”.
Jon and Briar were the most beautiful couple that I’ve ever met, madly in love and completely devoted to each other. As far as I could tell, they didn’t have any other friends and they seemed to like it that way. I felt deeply honored to be what seemed to be their only friend. Briar’s dad Rick was around some, and Briar’s brother Brock was hanging around, always upstairs, and they were just absolutely mellow, sweet guys. What you’d think and the way it was are two different things. Jon didn’t even own a CD player then. I gave him a couple of Old Crow Medicine Show CD’s and surprized me by saying that he didn’t own one, and although we talked about music, it was never on at the house. They didn’t like the electricity.
When we talked about his “getting naked on stage” he confided to me that he’d done it since he was a child, and was in and out of the foster care system partially because of his problem. I said flat-out “you’re a flasher” and he winced and said “it’s more of an impulse control problem” and indicated his relief to have found an accepting venue for it with the Phish audience, as well as his astonishment that every effort to quash this highly objectionable anti-social behavior was feeble at best.
He seemed to appreciate my candor and my realism at the time.
Me: “Do you have any fucking idea how illegal that is?”
Him: “Um, well yeah, or not really. I mean, they haven’t put me in jail yet.”
I was amazed at how frigging clueless the guy was.
Me: “How many times did you do it?”
Him: “About nine.”
Me: “What did the band say about it?”
Him: “I think they got pissed. I don’t see why everybody makes a big deal about it.”
I have the distinct feeling that he should have had his ass tanned the very first and last time that he exposed himself; this would not be happening.
He indicated that it was his proclivity to expose himself onstage was the reason for the break-up, and that he was waiting for the statute of limitations to expire.
Jon Fishman was the finest man I’d ever met who amazingly was like talking to a dumb wall about why he shouldn’t do it.
His biggest regret was that his mother Mimi never came out of the darkness enough to see that flashing wasn’t a bad thing He’d foisted his guilt off onto her.
After having been falsely charged by my old friend Jon Fishman, and sued, and hauled off to jail when I haven’t done a thing, I finally, after three years, am now fighting back.
I have just filed the following counter-suit and maneuvered Jon Fishman’s suit against me into Federal Court where I can’t lose because I am right.
This sucks for the drummer of Touchpants, the Jon Fishman that very few know until now.
This is for the proverbial taped-up boy that Touchpants keeps taped up in the back of their taped-up minds.
These are the counter-suit, and it’s removal to the Federal Court motion, and the affidavit of probable cause to arrest Jon Fishman for a litany of crimes.
I take no pleasure in any of this. Jon Fishman could have apologized at any point up until this time and I would have been bound to forgive him.
He’s dumb as a post.
06/14/16\
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MAINE, BANGOR DIVISION
to be removed from
Belfast District Court
Jonathan Fishman ) CV-2016-O62
Plaintiff ) Related Case BEL 14-910
v )
) Jury Trial
Bradley Williams ) Counter-claim
Petitioner/Defendant ) Petition to Transfer Venue
) Petition to Compel a Federal Grand Jury
) to Bring Criminal Charges
) Counter motion for Prelim Injunction
) Petition for Discovery

Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Federal Rules of Procedure, Defendant requires the above referenced civil lawsuit and his subsequent amended counter-suit be removed to the United States District Court in Bangor, Maine for the following reasons:
1) Defendant has filed a valid Federal complaint against every judge, prosecutor, police officer and lawyer in the State of Maine for extortion and the return of the $60 “bail commissioner’s fee” levied unlawfully upon every person arrested in the State of Maine regardless off innocence or guilt lending the appearance of bias against every Maine state judge. Every state judge is a defendant in this valid action rendering it inappropriate for any to preside over the counter-claim. This is clearly Federal.
2) Defendant is accusing the plaintiff of Federal crimes under 18 USC and 42 USC, as well as state offenses that the state judges have refused to consider to the point of obstruction of justice.
3) Defendant is alleging that the state judges are co-conspirators with the plaintiff in that they have aided and abetted him because he is the Democratic spokesperson and a keynote speaker at this years Democratic convention, a violation of judicial ethics.
4) Defendant has brought an action against the plaintiff’s alleged co-conspirators Belfast police chief Mike McFadden and deputy Merl Reed in US District Court for Federal civil rights violations under 18 USC 242, 243 and 42 USC as well as RICO violations against all
5) Defendant is requesting an injunction against the plaintiff to prevent him access to children until the allegations of sex-crime flashing against children has been adjudicated. Plaintiff is the drummer for the rock bands Phish and Touchpants and is scheduled to go on tour this summer. An injunction from one of the state judges would not prevent his access to children in other states.
6) Defendant is alleging that the plaintiff is using the state of Maine and it’s complicit police and judiciary as a place of sanctuary and safe refuge from prosecution for his extensive litany of sex crimes in other states, as evidenced by the retaliatory arrest and retaliatory prosecutions by the state judges, DA’s and police.
7) Defendant was sued for monetary and punitive damages by the plaintiff, and is counter-suing for well over the statutory $75,000 limit required for this to be heard in US District Court.
The Plaintiff fraudulently filed a motion for a preliminary injunction which was tossed by Judge Spiraca and based it fraudulently on seven claims rebutted thus:
1) Denied: this was just adjudged as fraudulent and frivolous; Defendant has never erred here and the Judge agreed. The signature on the order was obtained fraudulently, and the Defendant had correctly rescinded his signature rendering it null and void. The signature was obtained with a verbal agreement to drop the bogus criminal charge, and the Plaintiff reneged.
2) Denied: the emails were privileged communications between the Defendant and his own ex-attorney, whom he was forced into an incestuous legal relationship with, with his adversary in court; Joe Baiungo was the Defendant’s lawyer first.
3) Denied: The privileged words in the email are true and were adjudicated as such.
4) Denied: The Plaintiff’s attorney somehow got the police to respond to the email in an astonishing amount of time, with no time to either ead the three emails required to meet the criteria of harassment. These emails were legitimate communications trying to vindicate the the egregious wrongs inflicted by the Plaintiff.
5) Denied: It was not a pamphlet, and every word was true.
6) Denied: The complaints are all based on fact, including the chief of police, as evidenced by the co-conspirator in the retaliatory prosecution, and 2nd attempt at same. This earned him a civil rights action.
7) Denied.
This visually-impaired, dyslexic, impoverished by the Plaintiff’s actions, now requires the court’s indulgence in his David versus Goliath against this now-cornered extremely wealthy sexual predator. Pursuant to M. R. Civ. P 65 (B) and Federal rule 11 the Defendant requests the following:
1) An injunction against Plaintiff leaving the State of Maine. Plaintiff has the ability to board a private plane and run and hide anywhere in the world.
2) An injunction against the Plaintiff taking the stage until this has been adjudicated. In his hit-piece in the Bangor Daily News, exhibit J, the Plaintiff’s attorney stated for the record that the Plaintiff “likes to get naked onstage” in the present tense, meaning the Plaintiff intends to re-offend and has learned no remorse for his flashing children from the stage.
3) An injunction against the Plaintiff holding a passport. The Plaintiff has the means to flee the country, and has exhibited a willingness in the past to cross state borders, even moving to Maine to avoid prosecution.
4) An injunction against the Phish organization from engaging in further retaliatory actions. This entire mess was retaliatory in nature and the court must impose stringent sanctions and penalties for anyone retaliating towards the Defendant. He is now an eye-witness in three Federal lawsuits and a murder investigation and has been rendered unprotected by the Plaintiff’s unlawful aggression.
5) An injunction against the Plaintiff from being within 1000′ of any playground, school, city park, theater or any place children may be present until this has been adjudicated.
6) An injunction against the Plaintiff liquidating or hiding his assets. Defendant is requesting a lien on his real property and a freeze on his bank accounts until this has been adjudicated.
At the heart of this action is the Plaintiff accusing the Defendant of “falsely alleging that I am an unregistered sex offender and sexual predator.” This is an obvious invitation for the Defendant to prove otherwise. The Plaintiff and his learned attorney asked for this inquisition, therefore it is now incumbent upon the court to oblige the unlearned pro se litigant that was dragged into this. Pursuant to M. R. Civ. Rule 26, and the Federal rule 11, the Defendant requests the following:
1) Depositions of 30 questions from Briar Fishman.
2) Deposition of 30 questions from deputy and cousin Merl Reed.
3) Deposition of 30 questions from Jon Fishman.
4) Deposition of 30 questions from Chief Mike McFadden.
5) Deposition of 30 questions from deputy Littlefield.
6) Deposition from Rick Lyon, Briar’s dad, a material witness.
7) Deposition of 30 questions from Joe Baiungo.
8) Examinations and evaluations of Jon Fishman by at least two State of Maine Board Certified psychiatrists regarding Mr. Fishman’s predilection for flashing children from stage.
9) Physical and psychological examinations and evaluations of the Plaintiff’s children for any signs of sexual trauma.
10) Psychological examinations and evaluations on Briar Fishman for obvious reasons; it was her false accusations that precipitated all of this. This casts serious aspersions on her rationality at home with her children around their pervert father.
11) All material on the phish.net servers for more evidence of sex crimes.
12) All materials on the touchpants.net servers for more evidence of sex crimes.
13) Confiscation and examination of the Plaintiff’s computers that should have been done years ago, for more evidence of sex crimes.
14) The contact information of anyone to lodge a complaint about the flashing.
15) The Plaintiff and his attorney need to be compelled to swear their un-sworn allegations and claims under penalty of perjury.
16) A court order for Plaintiff’s arrest. See attached Affidavit of Probable Cause to Arrest Jon Fishman.
17) A comprehensive list of every one of the Plaintiff’s flashing incidents including, but not limited to, dates, times, venues, etc.
WHEREFORE, Defendant seeks a preliminary injunction ORDERING the Plaintiff to comply, and WHEREFORE, the Defendant seeks the aforementioned discovery materials now.

Dated this beautiful evening of June 30th, 2016.

Bradley Paul Williams

58 City Point Road
Belfast, Maine 04915
All rights reserved, copyright 2016
04/27/16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MAINE, BANGOR DIVISION
REMOVED FROM BELFAST DISTRICT COURT

Jonathan Fishman

V

Bradley Williams

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

BEL-2016-062
Related Case BEL 14-910 Counter Complaint
Jury Trial

INTRODUCTION
Defendant is a pro se visually-impaired dyslexic who was arrested for having a series of three dreams about the Plaintiff. He had struggled with whether or not to share his very unusual visions with the Plaintiff for 7 years. The first dream had come to fruition with the reunification of the band Phish. Finally, when he realized that the 2nd of his dreams was coming true, as it alarmingly involved Mrs. Fishman, an SUV, ISIS and five children, and these elements had now materialized as reality and not a dream, the Defendant very reluctantly wrote the Plaintiff a letter, exhibit A, with one purpose only; to circumvent Mrs. Fishman from driving on I-95 in an SUV with 5 children in it. This was the Defendant’s crime. He was trying to avert tragedy. His letter also contained a $40 cash gift to their charitable Mimi Fishman Foundation fund. He had apologized profusely for the unusual letter in the letter itself. The Plaintiff s wife, however, wasn’t buying it.
Mrs. Fishman professes to be a Wiccan, or a white witch, as evidenced by numerous references to her pagan faith on her Facebook page. Wiccans are well-known for their anti-christian beliefs and hold such beliefs up to ridicule and scorn. During the friendship between the Fishman’s and the Defendant, the Defendant was made very uneasy by the Plaintiff s disparaging remarks about Christianity and the Defendant’s faith. Some of these can be inferred from her Facebook page. Other anti-christian beliefs are evidenced by the Touchpants videos, exhibit B, with songs like “Jesus Had a Baby (From His Pee-hole”.
For about four months the Defendant entered into a close personal relationship with Mr. and Mrs. Jon Fishman in which Mr. Fishman revealed very intimate details into Mr. Fishman’s well-known proclivity for flashing, the very illegal act of exposing ones genitalia to others. Mr. Fishman was on hiatus from his duties as drummer for the band Phish and had indicated that he had been “inspired to quit” by his fellow band mates, who really didn’t know how to deal with the problem, as technically they were accessories before, during and after the fact of his sex crimes, for that is what they are.
The Plaintiff was at the time deeply withdrawn from society in an effort to avoid prosecution for his sex crimes and could quote chapter and verse of the offending U.S. Code and was hoping for the seven year statute of limitations to expire, but was foiled when it was overturned.
The Plaintiff only learned that the statute of limitations had been over-turned on sex crimes against children when the Defendant asked if he were aware of the change while he was under oath during April’s hearing; the Defendant informed the Plaintiff on the stand during his failed 2nd attempt at a retaliatory unlawful arrest that the statute had been overturned after admitting to sex crimes from stage while under oath, exhibit P. Two of his band mates had allegedly dodged their own allegations of sexual improprieties with under-age children in separate well-publicized occurrences.
For four months the Defendant agonized with the Plaintiff about his family’s future, waiting for the police to pull up the driveway to arrest him, an arrest that would never come. The Defendant heard things that he didn’t want to hear, of attorneys and pay-offs in other states, and of waking up hung-over to the angry tirades of his fellow band-mates aghast that he’d exposed himself yet again. He described the repetition of “everyone’s nightmare” of being in school naked, but this was real, exponentially magnified because he was really on stage. Jon Fishman experienced the same very real shame and remorse as anyone else would in their worst dreams; only this is far too real, and made exponentially worse by his massive consumption of LSD, well-publicized information,see Relix magazine et al.
Jon Fishman described the shame and remorse that finally put Mimi Fishman into her grave; she was not very proud of her penis-waving son, according to Jon Fishman himself, who described his flashing as an “impulse control problem” which deeply bothered his mother, and he couldn’t understand why.
The newly Christian Defendant was very conflicted. He couldn’t tell the Plaintiff’s about his new­ found burgeoning Christian faith that had saved him, or they would ostracize him, and he loved them. He wanted to help them but he could not. The Defendant’s suspected that a Christian was in their midst, which is a no-no in the Phish family of friends.
This action is actually a hate crime, but the Fishman’s are far too politically correct to ever outwardly say that; but it is a hate crime and would have never happened otherwise. To them, Christians commit hate crimes, and are never subject to them. Non-believing Phish fans send truckloads of strange mail but none are arrested for it.
The friendship ended when the Plaintiff announced to the Defendant over nachos at Dos Amigos that Phish had reunited, and not a moment before, as falsely indicated by the Plaintiff in his complaint, exhibit C. This was the Wednesday two days before their first rehearsal. The friendship was far deeper and of a much longer duration than the Plaintiff has stated in his remarks and allegations. The Defendant picked up the tab on the last day of their friendship. Jon Fishman continued to call the Defendant even after the band had reunited, apologizing for stealing his juicer, and then shipping it back. The Plaintiff allowed the Defendant unrestricted access to his now empty farm house in Maine long after he’d indicated in his police reports, or in his perjured testimony of this week. The Plaintiff was friendly with the Defendant up to the day that the Defendant inadvertently walked into the store seeing activity, but not knowing that the Fishman’s were back home. The coincidence is admittedly hard to believe, but is true. The Defendant had walked through that same door 100 times before he’d ever met the Plaintiffs because it was a store, and the doors were wide open. The Defendant bought blueberries from the Plaintiffs on the very day that the Plaintiff’s alleged was stalking behavior. Defendant still has the Plaintiff’s phone numbers but has never harassed them to date with a phone, therefore they are liars.
The friendship was not strained and cordial, with no problems whatsoever that the Defendant is aware of, until the fraudulent restraining order was produced with the astonishing allegation the the Defendant had published a magazine article in a “chimney sweeping magazine.” The Defendant sadly told the Plaintiff at Dos Amigos just before the reunion, “It was nice knowing you”. The Plaintiff said “We’ll still be friends,” but the Defendant knew better. The Christian defendant had renounced a similar lifestyle in close proximity to the Grateful Dead, and being the drummer for Phish with a Christian in the wood-pile, the Plaintiff and the Defendant were now mutually exclusive.
This was a hate crime as well as sex crimes. Jon Fishman exhibits astonishing criminal behavior and appears to be “too big to jail”.
The Defendant sadly and reluctantly said goodbye to Jon Fishman, his $400 juicer , and two hard covered books that he had borrowed and later feloniously described as unwanted gifts, even under oath under perjury, as he watched their friendship end with the reunification of Phish.
The entire story can be gleaned from exhibits 1, and exhibits A-R; and the attached filings.
ENTER THE CROOKED ATTORNEY JOE BAIUNGO
When Joe Baiungo first graduated from Colby College he had a desk at Blake and Hazard, but no clients. The running joke at Bruno’s across the street from the law office was the new attorney’s lack of anyone willing to try their luck with the very young Joe Baiungo. Finally, the Defendant had swallowed a piece of glass at the Holiday Inn in Bangor, and instead of submitting the claim for the emergency room bill himself, The Defendant signed a contingency agreement with Joe Baiungo out of kindness.
Five months later the Defendant approached Joe Baiungo very concerned because Joe had not yet contacted the Holiday Inn and was procrastinating. Collection letters were generated and damage was done. Joe Baiungo then terminated their contingency agreement with a terse “Due to an increased work­ load I can no longer represent you” letter.
Then followed a series of ever-increasingly angry letters to Joe eerily similar to these exhibits I, attached here.
Much later the Defendant’s house burned to the ground along with the evidence of Joe Baiungo’s indiscretion; the coast was now clear, to Baiungo’s deviant mind anyway, to accept the Defendant’s new arch­ nemesis as his client, with disastrous results for everyone involved, from the highest courts in the land, as evidenced by the federal complaints that Baiungo has forced his old client to file, down to the bail commissioners, all sued because of Joe Baiungo. Just the appearance of a conflict should have precluded his taking the Fishman’s as clients, who must now bear the brunt of Joe Baiungo’s astonishing legal actions brought here and now this week. The Defendant actually aches for the Fishman’s predicament brought about by Joe Baiungo. The Defendant emphatically takes NO pleasure in the misfortune that the Fishman’s have placed themselves into. He will when he sues Baiungo to seek retribution on their behalf.
THE FEE SCHEDULE
On January 28th, 2015 the Defendant submitted a fee schedule to the Fishman’s and Joe Baiungo
which states “My fee schedule to you, Jon Fishman, and Briar Fishman is $1,000,000 for each deprivation of rights under color of law (but not limited to) 18USC 242 and conspiracy to do the same under 18 USC 241. To accept these terms, simply continue to conspire to deprive me of my God-given rights.”
Joe Baiungo’s refusal to answer or acknowledge receipt of this fee schedule put him in dishonor, and gave the Defendant constructive notice that the Plaintiffs could not violate more of his rights without paying $1,000,000 each apiece per occurrence.
Joe Baiungo has now acknowledged receipt of the fee schedule, however, it is doubtful that he has transmitted any of this to his client yet, as he still has a job.
Instead of denying or refuting the emailed allegations and fee schedule, attorney Baiungo instead called the police and reported them as harassing letters, trying for yet another retaliation arrest; the court, police and DA’s were all in on the fix. All seem mortified to see the attempt fail. Baiungo’s co-conspirator police chief Mike McFadden issued yet another highly illegal departmental restraining order circumventing Defendant’s legal processes, and attempted yet another false arrest, for which a Federal Civil Rights complaint was filed.
The Plaintiff and his attorney have activated the fee agreement four times at $2,000,000 each; first when the Plaintiff filed for another fraudulent restraining order and tried for another retaliatory prosecution ; again when they filed a civil lawsuit; the third time with the devastating Bangor Daily News article, which was done to influence the outcome of the hearing, and to further assassinate the character of the Defendant, and the 4th was when Baiungo entered the Defendant’s privileged emails into court. The emails are protected under client/attorney privilege and are the intellectual property of the Defendant and this falls under the fee agreement.
This seems to bring the mutually agreed upon damages to $8,000,000, but the Defendant is dyslexic; please check the math.
In the same letter the Defendant had cautioned them a year before it happened , “I’m naming you in a counter suit for blatant conflict of interests causing deprivation of rights, emotional and physical distress, lost wages, valuable time and other damages”.
The Plaintiff s lied to the paper and said that the Defendant had threatened to be the aggressor in a suit. It seems rather obvious now that the Defendant is the only one with any credibility, and that includes the libelous Bangor Daily News, that fraudulently said “file suit” instead of “file counter suit”.
Perhaps the Plaintiff s should have heeded the Defendant’s dreams that started this instead of jailing him. The Defendant had fore-knowledge that the Plaintiff would sue first, and that was an unwelcome letter to them as well. They didn’t heed that warning either, and this is the result. The identical twin Defendant that dreams knew that he was counter-suing a year in advance and this is the proof; no chimney sweep is that smart, therefore, there is a God.
THE DREAMS
The first dream was remarkable in that Phish had reunited; an event that seemed impossible to the Defendant at the time. It had many remarkable elements, foremost was that the band would be reunited, which was not welcome news to the Defendant.
The 2nd dream was of Briar Fishman driving an SUV with 5 children in it. At the time it seemed unremarkable. In the dream, the SUV was stopped in grid-locked traffic. Men in black hooded robes were patrolling the interstate, and it was night, and there were gunshots, screaming and cars and tires burning all up and down the jammed interstate. A truck pulled along side the SUV, and Arabic men broke out the windows, and opened fire. The Defendant dreamed of the black flag of ISIS well before ISIS. The dreams haunted the Defendant because they seemed so very real. The Defendant now had five kids and an SUV, and ISIS was now extant.
The Defendant agonized for two weeks about whether he should tell his friends his dreams, so he wrote them exhibit A and asked if he could, and enclosed $40 to soften the blow. The third dream now won’t be told.
Briar Fishman then called the sheriff and was told that they needed “three or more acts of intimidation, confrontation, physical force, or the threat thereof” and all she had was a letter with $40 in it. She had only seen the Defendant once in eight years. So she, Jon Fishman and deputy Merl Reed all sat down and composed a fraudulent document, obfuscating all of the facts, and turning simple kindnesses into criminal allegations. Delivering chocolates to the farmer’s market libelously became a stalking offense, and fortune cookie fortunes became the obsession of a mad-man, and the Christian had been nailed to his cross.
The juicer that he’d entrusted them with, that they had stolen, became his millstone around his neck, and he was cast into the sea, accused in his own town of stalking the entire family.
This constitutes violations of 17A MRS Section 21 “False public alarm or report”; 17AMRS 453, 1,B, 1″Unswom falsification”; 17A MRS 19 “Falsification inofficial matters”. For the pair to agree and to have a meeting of the minds with deputy Merl Reed (the Defendant’s cousin) constitutes conspiracy, or 17AMRS Section 151 “Criminal conspiracy”.
Pursuant to the authority granted the Defendant in 17A MRS 16, “Warrentless arrest by private
party,”it is the intention of the Defendant to personally place the Plaintiff under citizen’s arrest for every crime articulated herein.
After the Defendant was angrily presented the fraudulent cease harassment order of protection by the very pissed-off police, he was vocally taunted to stay away from his “victims”. Hurt, dejected and rejected, he filed the attached motion to the court, exhibit D, the refusal for cause, notarized and under penalty of perjury, and sent it via registered mail at the order of this very court’s elegant Jennifer Dodge.
This document was filed with the court on 9/4/2014 and was entitled Notice of Refusal and Returned for Cause. It attached and referenced the rules for such matters, articulated the many falsehoods, lies and errors in their allegations, and invited them to a motions hearing in front of a judge, which they obviously could not do, so the Plaintiffs retaliated by filing a retaliatory prosecution, apparently bribed the police and everyone else, and had their Christian friend dragged away in chains on a Friday night with six false criminal charges of tampering with a witness, terrorizing, harassing and three other charges. The legal motion really pissed them off.
The Plaintiff’s showed their co-conspirator deputy Merl Reed the envelope with green registered mail stickers on it, containing a notarized motion articulating their crimes, that was filed with the court, and somehow convinced him that this was as serious of a crime as saving fortune cookies are, and delivering chocolate samples to the farmer’s market.
This constitutes a new round of the same charges above, plus violations of 17A MRS 454, “Tampering with a witness”; 17A MRS 754 “Obstructing” ; and pursuant to violations of USC 242 “Deprivation of Civil Rights Which Results in a Kidnapping,”; and 18 USC 241 “Conspiracy to Deprive Rights”. 18 USC 242 calls this a kidnapping, and a serious capital offense. The Defendant only notes this peculiarity and will not be seeking the death penalty. The Defendant didn’t name this a kidnapping, the U.S. Code does.
On 4/24/2016 , the Plaintiff met the Defendant in court, and the Plaintiff admitted on the stand under oath to at least one count of exposing himself to children from the stage, exhibit P. “But that was in 1994”. The Defendant then asked the Plaintiff if he was aware that the Supreme Court had overturned the statute of limitations on sex crimes against children, and the Plaintiff looked astonished and bewildered.
The Defendant tried unsuccessfully to place the Plaintiff under arrest for the aforementioned violations of the law, as well as violations of 18 USC Section 1073 “Unlawful flight to avoid prosecution for sex crimes”; 18USC Section 2140 “Aggravated sexual abuse”; and 18USC Section 2243 “Aggravated sexual abuse of a child”. These arrests must be made.
Pursuant to the authority granted the Defendant in 17A MRS 16, “Warrentless arrest by private party,” it is the intention of the Defendant to personally place the Plaintiff under citizen’s arrest for every crime articulated herein when he comes to court.
In court, the Defendant was prevented from exercising his constitutional duty to arrest Mr. Fishman for his crimes by the judge , and objected on the record that this was obstruction of justice; this was a serious violation of the Defendant’s duty to stop heinous disregard for social norms such as sex crimes against children; as this is a duty, not a right. The Judge violated 17A MRS 754 “Obstruction of justice “, as well as 18 USC Chap. 73 “Obstruction of Justice”.
The Defendant accepts the judges apology in advance with the admonition to please not do it again.
THIS ACTION AS ANOTHER CRIMINAL ASSAULT
The Defendant mailed a letter about some dreams with a $40 gift. This caused a typical Wiccan female response towards a typical Christian white male; hissing and claws which became a class D criminal assault on the long-suffering Bible believing chimney sweep, hence this was a hate crime.
When he rightly responded at law, and did a very good job at it, it infuriated her, prevailing upon her husband to do something criminal as well.
Potiphar’s wife had Joseph the dreamer thrown into chains, and Joseph wound up owning the place.
This Defendant too had been thrown into the pit for having dreams. He hadn’t rejected her sexual advances like Joseph had, but he rejected her friendship. The Jezebel spirit is alive and well in Belfast, Maine. Just look at Abigail Curtis of the Bangor Daily News.
The Defendant prays for God’s will here, and salvation for all. This is his motivation. He gives money away.
Finally, out of desperation for some sort of vindication., the chimney sweep turned to civil disobedience and distributed around twenty fliers. The bait was set, and the Phjsh took it hook, line and sinker. That big red bobber went straight under, and the Defendant had hooked the biggest Phish ever. That bobber is still under water, and the Defendant is now reeling him in.
When Jon Fishman filed that fraudulent request for yet another order of protection, it was yet another attempt at yet another retaliatory prosecution . He’d be grateful for a dead Defendant so he can go on flashing, and visually and aurally molesting 1000s of children unmolested by the Bible believing Defendant.
When Joe Baiungo amazingly started this civil action he was trying desperately to arrest the Defendant again, this time for exercising his 5th Amendment free speech rights; they know that Phish relinquished his privacy long ago, whereas the Defendant’s unusually stringent desire and right to privacy has been wrenched and extorted from him by the unrepentant Plaintiff. This attempt to have the Defendant arrested again was Joe Baiungo’s only last hope of rescuing the charade that he had initiated when he accepted the unfortunate Fishman’s as his client; he had to get the police to make a charge stick or all was lost. This civil action was an act of desperation, and the Defendant is in awe.
When the Defendant baited them with yet another email, and they pounced, and the complicit police were at the Defendant’s door within five minutes; they didn’t even have time to open an email, let alone read the several privileged letters that Baiungo alleged were harassing. Had the police actually read them, they would have arrested Joe Baiungo for defrauding the Fishman’s, and filing a false report, which reminds the Defendant, that’s another $2,000,000 according to the agreed upon fee schedule, bringing the total to $10,000,000. He’d inflamed the cops falsely depriving Defendant of his rights.
BEFORE THIS GOES TO TRIAL
The Plaintiff swore under penalty of perjury to this court that the Defendant had “falsely alleged that I am an untreated sex offender and sexual predator..”
At the heart of this claim are the words falsely alleging which the Defendant now must refute. The Defendant’s defense requires that the layman chimney sweep now prove that the Plaintiff is indeed an untreated sexual offender, and a sex criminal.
The easiest way to do this is to arrest the Plaintiff for his obvious crimes and let the courts do their job and sort it out.
These are extremely outrageous sex-crimes, and the Plaintiff has already admitted to at least one under oath. It is incumbent upon this court to treat Jon Fishman just like anybody else accused as a sex criminal.
TOUCHPANTS: A NEW GENRE OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
The Plaintiff has started a band, exhibit B, loved only by the sickest, most deviant level of society. “A Comedy Troupe of Poop”. The website http://www.touchpants.com reveals an alarming look at a new trend started by Mr. Fishman closely resembling sites like NAMBLA, the man/boy/child love organization of serious pedophiles bent on normalizing their sex crimes into civil society. The Plaintiff s videos online reveal songs by Jon Fishman with names like “Cat Blow Job”, “Floppy the Coke Cock” which is a reference to why Jon Fishman doesn’t show signs of arousal while he’s flashing children from the stage, “Two in the Pink, One in the Stink” and “Jesus Had a Baby” to name just a few.
One of the Plaintiff s performances encourages the audience to masturbate with feces while the
singer is shoving a microphone up his ass. Another You Tube video of Touchpants is entitled “Jon Fishman Makes Girl Expose Her Breasts” while another video states that an audience member was abused, assaulted, ridiculed publicly and thrown on the street when he objected to the obscenities that he had naively paid for. Their slogan is “$5 to get in, $50 to leave”.
PHISH AS ACCESSORIES
While under oath Jon Fishman stated and charged that the Defendant had also falsely alleged that his band-mates were accessories to his sex crimes. The band Phish was correct many years ago in “inspiring Jon to quit” but they blew it when they took Mr.Touchpants back. A Clarence Darrow could craft a pretty good argument about the fellow band-mates relinquishing the family values that hold society together in favor of riches, fame and fortune. It doesn’t take a leap of logic at all to see that theirs are ill-gotten gains. This casts serious aspersions on their previous brushes with alleged child victims. Defendant is puzzled why the Plaintiff would drag his friends in, yet he opened this door. That is why they should be named in this counter-suit. The Plaintiff saying that they are not accessories means that they are, and must now be scrutinized. Let’s see all of their hard drives. The Plaintiff stretched out his hand upon the Defendant’s family, so this is imminently fair. Phish allowed this problem to fester and should pay to lance the boil from all of their ill-gotten gains.
REFUTING THE COUNTS
On page 5 of the protection order of 4/12/2016, The Plaintiff made 9 allegations.
1. Denied: Venue is Federal Court because of the action brought against every state judge and attorney, the Federal charges against the Plaintiff, and the amount being over $75,000. The order of protection was fraudulently obtained and was adjudicated as such.
2. Denied: the “Trophy Buck” catalog was a Christmas gift that somebody had given the Defendant’s cousin Merl Reed, the night-poaching arresting officer friend of Briar Fishman’s that goes by “hotcop@yahoo .com”.A DNA test will prove that Reed re-gifted the calendar toframe the Defendant.
3. Denied: : the Defendant said that he was going to counter-sue the Plaintiff and take every penny he had. He eerily had fore-knowledge. The Plaintiff perjured himself when he used the word “sue”instead of the accurate “counter-sue” . There is a big difference under oath. The Bangor Daily News had made the serious offense of libeling the Defendant with this same error.
4; Denied: There were no said emails, and the Plaintiff is an untreated sex criminal..
5. True. This is a confession to his crimes and corroboration of Defendant’s veracity.
6. True. Defendant posted the flier in civil disobedience to stop the sex criminal.
7. Denied: The complaints against the BPD are rational and true. It is the same police officer’s that did the treasonous retaliatory arrest on the Defendant, giving credence to his other allegations; as they clearly were in serious violations of the law, and very comfortable with it.
8. Denied: The allegations are profoundly true, therefore it is the allegations of the Plaintiff s that are “per se” defamatory, and not the Defendant’s. The allegations that the Defendant was extorting money is turned back upon the Plaintiff s who had initiated this action against the Plaintiff, and tried unsuccessfully to extort and ruin him.
9. Denied:
10. Denied: this has just been disproved and adjudicated in court.
11. Denied: the Defendant had stated in his very first filing of refusal of the very first “chocolate” allegations that it was the Plaintiff s that were the ones acting in reckless disregard, and they jailed him for it. This was plagiarized.
12. Denied: the Defendant’s letters were written under severe mental duress caused by the actions of the Plaintiffs. The Defendant has never once asked the Plaintiff for money, even picking up the tabs at Dos Amigos, donating still to the Mimi fund, and even a $50 cash donation to Joe Baiungo when he ran for DA. Plaintiff sued the Defendant and it has again been adjudicated that there was no harassment or criminal behavior on Defendant’s part.
COUNTER CLAIMS
1. The Plaintiffs knew as they wrote their original false statements that they were misleading the Defendant’s own cousin deputy Merl Reed. They intentionally drove a wedge right into the heart of the Defendant’s family, causing a schism that can never be repaired. The simpler members of the family can not imagine that the Defendant’s crooked-cop cousin would lie about our own; they must believe him, the rock star, his beautiful wife and the newspapers over the unusual solitary chimney sweep. These damages are infinite.
2. When the Plaintiffs had the Defendant arrested for mailing the court document they were apparently assured that “the fix was in”, and knew that the arrest for stalking type behavior would destroy a small chimney business.
3. The Plaintiffs deliberately hired the Defendant’s own attorney; the Defendant had warned
the Plaintiff s about Joe Baiungo’s mishandling of their case together years earlier. They hired him specifically to do maximum damage, and it worked. The psychological and emotional trauma of having his own attorney and confidant, whom had defrauded him before, aid and abet the wealthy sex offender with intimate knowledge of exactly how to “press the right buttons”for maximum damage, is total and complete “shock and awe”.
4. In defending himself from this unprecedented attack on his character and quiet enjoyment of life, the Defendant had to throw himself into the study of law at the expense of everything else; music, love, gardening, cooking, massage, life itself, and had to stuff his brain with the equivalent of a Colby College education. Whatever Joe Baiungo paid for his education, and expenses, and punitive damages, are what the Plaintiff s owe the Defendant on this claim alone.
5. In defending himself against these vicious unlawful attacks the Defendant has had to
immerse himself into the murky world of pedophilia for a peek at some very disturbing stuff, and the Defendant is scared and scarred. These images, particularly the Touchpants videos, are images that don’t belong in the human psyche at all. The Defendant sincerely hopes that the Plaintiff s gravelly voice singing “Give me one, please give me two, gotta have three gallons of pee” will fade from the PTSD sound-loop in his head. The entire three year ordeal has aged the Plaintiff twenty five years, and he has suffered from a stress-related heart-attack, and stress related blindness from a detached retina.
6. The Defendant’s business took a deadly nose-dive after the first newspaper article. The
Defendant finally had to remove the signage from his truck and retire from business after the last Bangor Daily News article orchestrated by Joe Baiungo in his last-ditch effort to have the Defendant jailed. The Plaintiff s have succeeded in destroying the Defendant’s reputation, livelihood, health, spirits, and even what little family had survived his many tragedies.
7. The fraudulent restraining orders prevented the Defendant lawful access to down town
Belfast, Lincolnville Center, the police station, the post office and the town square because of the proximity to Joe Baiungo’s office. They effectively restricted the Defendant from even lawfully serving Joe Baiungo with documents, which most attorneys would regard as illegal.
8. The fraudulent restraining orders alienated the Defendant from all of the police services,
causing a drive-by shooting to remain not investigated; officer’s cited the Defendant’s “credibility” and accused the Defendant of shooting his own house. The “credibility” the errant officers cited is obviously these false allegations that the entire state now believes.
9. The residual effects of the Plaintiffs egregious actions towards the Defendant will linger for life. The FBI has classified Phish fans as a criminal organization. Any drummer that can “force a girl to expose her breasts”and allow a fan to be “punched in the chest and ejected” for having the audacity to react badly to “Jesus Had a Baby” can have the Defendant killed. The Defendant will now have to have enhanced security and body guards, which is what the Plaintiff s have alleged towards the Defendant.
10. The innocent Defendant’s mugshot is now online providing a target for every drug-crazed Phish fan that might want to take a shot. Indeed, the Defendant’s house has been shot, and the Plaintiff’s lap-dog cops won’t respond. His customers now find a mugshot for stalking crimes when they Google him.
11. The Plaintiff intentionally inflicted emotional distress.
12. The Plaintiff intentionally destroyed Defendant’s privacy.
13. The Plaintiff intentionally destroyed the Defendant’s reputation.
14. The Plaintiff intentionally caused PTSD.
15. This Defendant once moved in the same circles socially as the Plaintiff ‘s. He’d shared his
knowledge of the area and it’s people to welcome the Fishman’s right into the heart of his family, home town and life. The betrayal felt in this confused attempt to push the only person that actually cared enough to say that this flashing is wrong is devastating. It’s devastating to see people like Trey Anastasio, the guitar playing hero of the Defendant, tum a complacent eye on this obvious affront to everything that is right. It’s devastating. What would Jerry Garcia do? He’d keep his pants on. I can assure you that he would agree with his once­ young erstwhile getting high buddy from so long ago in Stinson Beach that yes, it is time to sue the pants off of Jon Fishman, the Pedophile Piper of Phish. Plus, he bad-mouthed the Grateful Dead’s Phil Lesh. Wavy Gravy himself gave the Defendant the nod saying “Jon Fishman is not one of us!”, emphasis his. This Emperor has no clothes. Get out your check book, mate. Checkmate.
16. Relief sought is $20,000,000 firm. The show must go on. All praise to Christ. This is what Jerry would do; play for keeps and give Jon Fishman the finger that his brother whacked off chopping wood. It’s better than Jon Fishman whacking off to memories of the children that he’s flashed. It would appear that an arrow of decency and kindness, launched 40 years ago by the maestro of the Grateful Dead himself, and his wife Mountain Girl, way back in Stinson Beach, has circled around our sun a few billion miles and found it’s mark right in the heart of Phish way up here in Maine. There really is a God, and it ain’t Jerry Garcia. God bless Jon Fishman the flasher of children; otherwise, one of the finest men alive.
17. Defendant incorporates the above allegations into this count as if set forth fully herein.
18. The untrue allegations of the Plaintiff are per se defamatory.
19. Plaintiff knows his statements are false and/or acted in reckless disregard for the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of the Defendant, as well as the children in his audience.
20. Plaintiff’s actions were to destroy the innocent Defendant, and it worked.
21. See attached Affidavit of Probable Cause to Arrest Jon Fishman.
Wherefore, Defendant seeks judgment in his favour and against the child-flashing Plaintiff in an amount to express the outrage of society and sufficient to deter the Plaintiff and others from engaging in similar conduct in the future.
I would sweat under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true.
All rights reserved; copyright 2016

Bradley Paul Williams
58 City Point Road
Belfast, Maine 04915
06/30/16
pg 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MAINE, BANGOR DIVISION

AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ARREST OF JON FISHMAN

Comes now Bradley Williams, sworn affiant, with probable cause to arrest Jon Fishman for, but not limited to, the following crimes:
1) 18 U.S.C. 242 “Deprivation of rights under color of law which results in kidnapping”, a capital offense.
2) 18 U.S.C. 243 “Conspiracy to deprive of rights”.
3) 18 U.S.C 2241 “Sexual abuse”
4) 18 U.S.C. 2243 “Sexual abuse of a child.”.
5) M.R.S. 17-A Section 453 “Un-sworn falsification”.
6) M.R.S. 17-A Section 454 “Tampering with a witness” for arresting Affiant for mailing a court document. Affiant was falsely charged with tampering..
7) M.R.S. 17-A Section 506 A and/or B, “Harassment”.
8) M.R.S. 17-A Section 509, “False public alarm or report”.
9) Misprision of felony.
10) The pleading standard is met for retaliatory prosecution re: Hartmann V Moore.
Introduction:
Affiant has been hindered in his efforts at justice by the fact that he is a simple man presenting himself because his own attorney Joe Baiungo had abandoned him in a flagrant display of a conflict of interests to represent the wealthy now-admitted child-flasher drummer for the bands Phish and inventors of a new genre of child pornography Touchpants. Their friends and colleagues in law are their co-conspirators. Plotkin vs CIA has been completely ignored when the reality of the situation is this: all have been obligated to share the burden of justice with this visually-impaired, dyslexic and forgetful old pro se litigant for all, by law, are the sworn guardians of Affiant’s constitutional liberties, and hence yours. In every court hearing and at every turn of the way Affiant has challenged all to articulate any crime committed by himself and none have; all he’s gotten were lies, ennui and libel, even from the newspapers. Equality under the law is paramount and Marsbury vs. Madison insists that any “law” that protects these renegade police officers is a nullity from it’s inception. These arrests must be made or we are no longer living in a free society. It is not a pro se Affiant’s job, victimized by the police, to compose the affidavit of probable cause for their arrests. It is beyond his ability. It is for a professional who’s sworn duty it is to compose the air-tight case, which cannot be completed without a full investigation hopefully by an energized and motivated FBI. This must not be dismissed in any part because of the inexperience of the Affiant, who right now is doing a lot of your jobs for you, and taking a lot of heat for it.

Chronological Narrative of Events
Part 1: Jeremy Alex’s Non-Investigation
On Saturday, April 24th, 2004 my guitar student Jeremy Alex disappeared. On Sunday evening April 25th I became aware of Jeremy’s disappearance via a telephone call from Edwin Baird who had asked me to participate in the search of the wooded area in Northport where Jeremy’s van had been discovered. On Monday morning April 26th I arrived at what was presumably a principal crime scene and was outraged to see about 25 hippies surrounding Jeremy’s van. Two were perusing the contents of Jeremy’s billfold that they’d found in the van. There was money in it. My outrage was towards the police who were nowhere to be seen.
I drove to the Sheriff’s office arriving in the still early morning where I was ushered into “the big meeting”, and many high-ranking cops were there including, but not limited to: Sheriff Scott Storey, his dad Wendell, Chief Deputy and ex-sheriff John Ford and Bob Keating of public safety. All had gathered over the Jeremy Alex murder. I angrily confronted them about their inaction, and I believe that I mentioned the billfold.
Their mood was very somber and grim and one appeared to be hung-over.
As an earliest founding member of Parents of Murdered Children who had lost his twin brother, his wife and their two babies to handgun violence in Craig, CO in January, 1988, I was livid that the crime scene was not secured. As a senior member of Parents of Murdered Children I have been near more murder investigations and aftermath than most police officers and have studied “Homicide Investigations: A Field Guide” and surmised that Jeremy’s billfold was a very crucial piece of evidence, so I informed the police then about the billfold. Reed and McFadden were dispatched to the scene but they took a very long time to get there. I never learned why a city cop and a county deputy were working out of a county unit or why the city cop was working out in the county.
During the meeting with the police I was there when Mr. and Mrs. Ted Alex arrived from New Hampshire and I was amazingly allowed to remain for their briefing. Ted Alex said, “Calm down, Brad, they’re just doing their jobs,” and I snapped at him, “No, they are not doing their jobs because the kids are out there crawling through the van and going through Jeremy’s stuff” and “I am a Parent of Murdered Children and they are jerking you around”. They finally decided to send someone out there for appearances sake. Later I would learn that they already knew that Jeremy was allegedly last seen at the BBQ Pig Roast at Hersham’s property on the Back Searsport Road on Saturday and that the Belfast officer’s had also tampered with that evidence, as well as tampering with witnesses at the pig roast.
As soon as the meeting was over I called all of the local TV stations in Bangor and they got to the scene well before Reed and McFadden although they had to drive from Bangor, which is 50 miles. Amy McCue was present with a news crew when McFadden and Reed finally swaggered through for the cameras. The news footage may reveal the billfold that the police do not want found on any footage, as that would be a smoking gun in the police’s hands..
They verbally harassed a couple of kids and left the scene. I said, “I wonder where they’re going?” I thought that the police were finally there to secure the crime scene and to aid in our search of the woods but they apparently just wanted the billfold that I’d complained about. A kid answered my query and told me where the two police officers were going; to Jeremy’s newer house just a short distance from where his van was discovered. I was unaware of this house but went there anyway because I was determined to find Jeremy and the police were acting very suspiciously. Merl Reed is my own cousin and I am familiar enough to spot erratic behavior on his part.
There was a cruiser parked out in front of Jeremy’s house and Mrs. Ames, Mrs. Harriman and Mrs. Elwell were all outside waiting to be interviewed. They all had stories to tell about the people that were hunting Jeremy on the Saturday afternoon, of a red pick-up truck with shady looking guys at the house, and all sorts of suspicious activities as they were all in their yards that beautiful Saturday afternoon and had never experienced such strange activities. All three ladies have informed me that the police never interviewed them, not to this day. They have all expressed suspicions of the police for their inaction. For Reed and McFadden to not interview these three eye-witnesses is prima facea evidence of abrogation of duty and of the cover-up to the Jeremy Alex murder. Two have since died of old age.
I went up to Jeremy’s screen door and paused just before knocking with my knuckle poised above my head and gasped at what I saw: Merl Reed was ogling a High Times Magazine centerfold excitedly showing the buds to Mike McFadden, who had Jeremy’s billfold in his hands counting the bills. Both were wearing blue nitrile gloves and there was a very large pressure cooker with the 5-6 screw fittings on top in front of them.
There were also scales, baggies and a bong.
“That’s a $400 pressure cooker” I said to them through the screen door. They both jumped in unison at the shock of being observed and became very unnerved and then quite annoyed when they realized that it was just me, Merl’s eccentric cousin that they never liked.
The mood of the officer’s was one of jubilant delight until they knew I was there, and they became very annoyed to be caught red-handed by me. One said, “Scram” and the other said “Beat it”, so I did.
I spent the rest of that week searching for Jeremy and the rest of the month at Mt. Percival watching for carrion birds that would locate the body. I knew that Jeremy was not out there because there were no vultures over Northport that month.
Reed and McFadden misled the search party by withholding the crucial fact that a motorist had reported Jeremy on the other side of Route 1 on Saturday afternoon after the call from the Monkeld’s which led all of the searcher’s astray searching the wrong side of Route 1 as Reed and McFadden sadistically looked on; therefore they knew that Jeremy was not in those woods.
Everyone in the search party felt betrayal and distrust of Reed and McFadden when we learned that we searched the wrong side of the highway for days.
Two years later Jeremy’s billfold had re-emerged found planted on the beach by people less than 2 blocks from where I had seen it in McFadden’s hands. I wouldn’t learn this fact for another several years, though. I learned this from a newspaper article archived at http://www.jeremyalex.com which is no longer posted. Naively, I had assumed that the billfold was in an evidence locker. It was instead obviously secreted by either Reed or McFadden working together in concert. .
The original complainants were Mr. and Mrs. Jim Monkeld. She was Jeremy’s high school teacher. That Saturday, according to the police in the media, they tried to restrain Jeremy when he frantically ran into their yard waving a huge wad of cash ranting that “bad people were after him”. They called the police who never came, not to this day. I received a statement from Jim Monkeld that neither McFadden nor Reed have ever interviewed them to this date. This caused great consternation and suspicions because the rumors were flying that one Cameron Philbrook had allegedly killed Jeremy, and that Cameron and Merl Reed were somehow relatives. I later learned that ex-convict Cameron Philbrook’s brother was married to Darleen Philbrook who was married to Merl Reed’s brother, my other cousin Dennis Vaughan, another convicted cocaine trafficker. They’re all related. Dennis Vaughan is Merl Reed’s half-brother.
The fact that the Monkeld’s were never sequestered or interviewed is prima facea evidence of abrogation of duty and of a criminal cover-up. The original complainants must be interviewed because Jeremy may have said who was chasing him. These are the last reliable witnesses to see Jeremy alive.
Inserting myself into a homicide investigation to the point of insinuating myself into a strategy meeting at the sheriff’s office should have made me a prime suspect, yet my having to resort to filing this affidavit without any counsel, totally unwanted by every investigator in the state is prima facea evidence of their cover-up.
The fact that I saw the billfold is why I was attacked unlawfully with the arrest on behalf of the sex-criminal Jon Fishman. The fact that I saw the billfold, as well as the other hippies at the van, is probable cause for the arrest of Merl Reed and Mike McFadden, and for relieving their co-conspirators like Bryan Cunningham from their duties.
This is an excerpt from the article that I finally read that proved to me that Reed and McFadden covered up the Jeremy Alex killing: For years, there were no more reliable clues, Ted Alex said last week. But about 2½ years ago, Jeremy’s driver’s license surfaced at a home on the shore in Northport along with a story of missed opportunity.
In 2004, a Northport couple was building a house on the ocean, and about a month after Jeremy disappeared, money started washing up onshore. Workers found about $30 in all, according to Alex.
About two weeks after that, Jeremy’s driver’s license washed up, too.
The couple had a bowl on their coffee table that was filled with everything that had floated in on the tides, and they put the license and the money in that. They never made the connection to the missing man. After the husband died, friends came to a get-together after his funeral. A retired highway patrol officer saw the driver’s license in the bowl and remembered hearing about Jeremy Alex.
“He called the police,” Ted Alex said. “He ended up e-mailing me about it, saying ‘I have $30 of Jeremy’s money and his license,’ which was obviously really bizarre.”
It is too bizarre and it makes no sense at all until you consider that I saw it in the police officer’s hands; therefore they had to have planted this evidence.
The police stated that Saturday Cove is the direction that Jeremy had run to from the Monkeld’s without having ever interviewed the Monkeld’s. This is a smoking gun in Reed and McFadden’s hands considering that Reed never answered their original call.
Another eyewitness refuted that by saying Jeremy crossed Route 1 after leaving the Monkeld’s, therefore the police lied.
I believe that I recall telling Ted Alex on April 26th, 2016 that the police had the billfold and that there was money in it, but Ted would have to confirm that.
It would be a safe guess that there is no body-cam footage of the interior of Jeremy’s house although there were two uniformed police officers with police-issued (Reed bought his own) body-cams conducting a murder investigation.
Unfortunately for Jon Fishman these are the same police that he seems to have bribed or somehow influenced to effect my false retaliatory arrest.
Part 2: Enter the Child-Flasher Drummer of Phish and Touchpants
See Exhibit #1
About 2006, I was approached by the caretaker of the late artist Neil Wellever’s estate asking me to go try to get the new owners of the 800 acre farm to allow me to clean their chimneys; “They’re really flaky and I’m afraid they’re going to burn the house down”. Wellever had previously set the cedar shingled roof on fire and the caretaker asked me to do this out of kindness.
Contrary to what the Fishman’s said in their attack upon myself, we’d become great friends and I loved them both dearly. We had supped together and shared the most intimate of details of our lives with each other. One night their boxer-dog Max got a face full of porcupine quills which we all pulled together. I was not a shadowy figure in the bushes. Their driveway is nearly a mile long. The Fishman’s were avid students of the simple Maine life of homeschooling children and heating with wood. Jon had repented the rock and roll lifestyle and particularly his flashing problem, he’d reasoned that the problem was solved if he wasn’t in Phish.
We bonded. I was his support group. This was Jon Fishman and his lady Briar Lyons. He had recently “been inspired to quit” his job as the drummer for Phish ostensibly, according to him, for his “impulse control problem” of flashing people, even from the stage in front of 1000’s of underage children. Fishman was waiting for the police to come and take him away but they never did. He had indicated that he couldn’t rejoin Phish until the statute of limitations had expired, if ever.
During our time together I experienced a series of three very bad lucid dreams, one of which involved Briar being married with 5 children, an SUV and ISIS terrorist soldiers were extant. I opted to not upset her with such bad dreams at the time. Seven years later I did. The first of my dreams had already come to fruition, and every element of the 2nd dream was now in place for tragedy.
About the time that the Supreme Court overturned the statute of limitations Phish went back to work; the arrest wasn’t coming.
Phish had reunited and the Fishman’s had moved away. They “accidentally” stole my $300 juicer and had to ship it back to me from Vermont. This was sent to their now empty farmhouse and I was allowed unlimited access to their deserted farmhouse in direct contradiction to their allegations of being afraid of me. I still had a key.
Seven years later I was driving by the Lincolnville Center Store which they had sold 7 years earlier, or so I thought. The doors were open and the lights were on so I went in. I was very surprised to find Jon and Briar there selling blueberries, so I bought two pints. She would later falsely describe this encounter in her complaint against me as a stalking event and left out the part about selling me blueberries, and deputy Reed later alarmingly decided to go along with it. I was left speechless to see that the elements of my dream were now in place; Briar now had an SUV, four new children, and on the front page of the newspaper was ISIS. I became frightened for her safety and well being, as my dream now appeared to be an ominous premonition, and as an identical twin, I put credence in dreams of this nature.
This was not the Jon and Briar that I knew and loved. I perceived an intense dislike. This was not the madly-in-love drummer for Phish, this was now the perverted drummer of Touchpants and this was our very first meeting, and we did not like each other. The kind Jon and Briar that I had once known were gone forever; they would have heeded my dreams. All of the rest of the following is the result of their choosing not to..
I agonized over whether to tell them about the dreams or not, but because I thought the dreams might avert tragedy, I wrote them a welcome home letter and enclosed $40 for the Mimi Fishman Foundation. In this letter I asked if I could tell them about the dreams. See attached exhibit A.
Phish receives strange mail by the truck-load, but mine was the only mail from a confidante that knew about the sex crimes. Fishman knew of my moral character that abhorred his flashing his penis at children, and now he was starting the pedophile-ish band “Touchpants”. The “Poopenis” album sings of little boys taped up in the back of a Pinto; “Black Cock in a Pink Sock” is about a prolapsed rectum following an anal rape. “Cat Blowjob” seems to be about sex with a cat nailed to a tree. “Daddy, I Have to Cump” seems to be about a little boy hanging upside down from a tree and peeing, and then masturbating with feces. “Windowless Van” is yet another reference to child rape. An attachment containing many links proving the public side of the depravity that is Fishman’s pedophile oriented band Touchpants” is exhibit B.
I lawfully mailed the letter containing $40 for charity and they called the police and Merl Reed was the detective. I was shocked when the Belfast Police issued a fraudulent “departmental restraining order” alleging criminal activity on my part. The Fishman’s litany of false allegations finally tossed by Judge Spiraca are exhibit C. Every allegation was a lie and my cousin deputy Merl Reed knew it.
I, not being a lawyer, went to the court and filed a Notice of Refusal and a Return for Cause motion denying their false allegations, Exhibit D, I swore to it and had it notarized, I filed it with the court on 9/4/2014 with clerk Jennifer Dodge. The clerk then instructed me to mail it to the Fishman’s. I protested because the police had verbally abused me and threatened to arrest me if I sent “one more piece of mail”. The clerk assured me of the court’s protection, but she was wrong. I sent the certified mail.
The Fishman’s called Merl Reed again and somehow got him to file a fraudulent affidavit of probable cause, see exhibit E, and I was dragged away from my house in chains on a Friday night in shock to be charged with six crimes. I was never mirandized.
Merl Reed signed the affidavit of probable cause, attached exhibit E, and I was arrested with a Uniform Summons and Complaint form, see exhibit F. Merl Reed’s signature appears to be forged on the summons form and is prima facea evidence of the conspiracy and the meeting of the minds between the sheriff’s deputy and the Belfast Police Chief, Reed and McFadden. McFadden had the original forged summons in his own hand on Friday night and was witnessed by an unnamed State Police trooper that accompanied him for the intimidation. A side-by-side comparison of the real signature, the forgery and a sample of McFadden’s handwriting are exhibit G. Their conspiracy here is obvious to a child.
This was a retaliatory arrest and was punishment for my knowing too much about the Jeremy Alex killing and the sex crimes of the police’s new best friend, the very cool and wealthy drummer for Phish. His celebrity and their knowledge of the Jeremy Alex killing clouded their minds to the point of criminal abrogation of duty.
It is a remarkable coincidence that these two incredible stories have conjoined.
My arrest was the beginning of my study of the law and over a year of emotional and physical distress as a result of my false arrest. It was the beginning of the demise of my family, reputation and livelihood. It is beyond the scope of this probable cause affidavit.
Finally, the harassment at the hands of the court ended with their dropping the charges.
I was extorted out of $60 as a result of the bail commissioner’s fee and have filed suit in Federal Court over that.
Part 3: Back to the Jeremy Alex Murder and Cover-up.
Shortly after the retaliatory charges were finally dropped several things happened to bring the Jeremy Alex murder back to my consideration: First, I met an eyewitness, David Linscott, Sr., who claims that his son was one of two people that abducted and beat Jeremy Alex unconscious and delivered him to his killer, and secondly, I read the article about Jeremy’s billfold having been found planted on the shore two years after his killing, which coincided with the State Police having to relieve Reed and McFadden of the Jeremy Alex investigation. David Linscott, Sr. provided me with a map to several bodies allegedly secreted in the back woods behind Cameron Philbrook’s house. See attached exhibit H. This map was allegedly authenticated by David Linscott, Jr., who was allegedly murdered for trying to get this map to the authorities. This map was allegedly drawn by a Bobby Whitcomb and is allegedly signed by a Michelle Philbrook, who is allegedly either the alleged killer’s mother or sister. Bobby Whitcomb was allegedly shown the property by Cameron Philbrook himself who allegedly bragged that there were from 6-9 bodies there. David Linscott, Jr. now needs his murder re-investigated in light of this new evidence, as his killing went un-investigated as well.
The story of Jeremy Alex from this point goes beyond my first hand knowledge but it is an amazing and awful tale of a human fox hunt with it’s participants all listening on police scanners, of $65,000 bribes, and Belfast Police at the BBQ Pig Roast deliberately botching the evidence while Jeremy’s clothes smoldered in a barrel right under their noses, and Jeremy’s last trip up Mount Waldo, naked and beaten unconscious, where he died, allegedly within earshot of Mike McFadden’s brother’s house and allegedly at the hands of Merl Reed’s ex-brother in-law relative. I have to articulate this hearsay so later investigators can fill in the blanks with affidavits from the above named witnesses, as well as comparisons of the police officer’s personal telephone logs compared with those of the alleged perpetrators.
I have two hours of audio/video taped depositions from an eye-witness that the authorities do not want; they do not want Jeremy Alex to be found because they know where he is. A 14:00 minute example is exhibited on You Tube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3p9uvN8dHg
The fact that I have a hand-drawn map to several bodies and not one cop will take my statement is prima facea evidence of their abrogation of their duties and of their involvement in the crimes.
Merl Reed is alarmingly the officer that would be entrusted with the K9 Unit searching his own relative’s yard investigating the same old case.
One thing is certain; there was a sheriff’s deputy dispatched to the Northport scene at Jim Monkeld’s that never went to the Monkelds house. Therefore, something deterred him which pertained to Jeremy and assured him in some haste that there was no need to ever go to the Monkelds. A logical presumption absent police records would be that Reed was this deputy and if so, this would be probable cause in itself to make the conclusion of guilt. Merl Reed and Mike McFadden still have some explaining to do. They still don’t want Jeremy to be found as evidenced by their silence on the matter to date. I have been making public written allegations to this effect for some time now and none rebut my allegations, therefore they are true.
Part 4: Subsequent Criminal Activity
Many years ago I hired attorney Joe Baiungo for a simple civil matter which he bungled very badly. I’d forgiven and forgotten him until Jon Fishman retained him in the matter of Fishman Vs. Williams when they first had me arrested. Joe Baiungo had offered to be a “friendly arbitrator” to which I agreed. We reached a verbal agreement whereas I signed an agreement to stay away from the Fishman’s for 1 year and they would drop the charges, to which I readily agreed. We were to all have a merry Christmas. I signed the agreement and they reneged and left me at the mercy of the court system, an accused stalker, and reviled.
The charges were finally dropped and I wanted vindication. I wrote our mutual attorney Joe Baiungo a series of increasingly angry emails, exhibit I, which he took to Mike McFadden claiming that I was again harassing and stalking the Fishman’s and now himself, although he’d never responded to them ever, in any way, or ever asked me to cease and desist.
These should have been protected by client/attorney privilege but our mutual attorney Joe Baiungo went to the newspaper with altered excerpts of these emails which made me look like my counterclaim was a claim and an extortion attempt. Exhibit J.
For the second time Chief Mike McFadden made the outrageous and unlawful decision to issue yet another fraudulent departmental restraining order in an attempt to circumvent this eye-witness to his tampering with the Jeremy Alex evidence, and attempted yet another unlawful retaliatory arrest on behalf of the now-admitted child-flasher of Touchpants.
Mike McFadden now had a serious problem; the man that knew about his criminality in the Jeremy Alex murder, and of his retaliatory arrest of myself was now accused of harassing the pedophile that he had been shielding. They all gambled and yet another fraudulent “departmental restraining order” was issued against me. I retaliated to this aggression against myself by printing around 20 “Sex Predator Alert” flyers, and distributed them to the newspapers, courthouses and city offices and the library. See exhibit K.
This was done as an act of civil disobedience in direct and hostile defiance of the unlawful restraining order in an attempt to focus attention on the Jeremy Alex murder and the maps to his body. This was done to force re-open the investigation without McFadden and Reed.
Mike McFadden then came to my house, sex flyer in hand, and trespassed upon my land threatening me with the violence of a second and third retaliatory arrest for “posting obscene material” and violating their fraudulent restraining order by posting the flyers. I reminded him of the first false arrest and of Jeremy Alex. He was angry and fumed “I worry about you, Brad”. After failing to get any admission of guilt from me he left, and failing to verbally harass me into submission with threats, they left. I pointed out that he should arrest the sexual predator instead of the guy distributing the warning signs quoting United States Code for his sex crimes.
Less than 24 hours after McFadden threatened me, my neighbors alerted me to “men with blue lights” in my yard at 3 AM. I was now being stalked by police. I was now getting very angry at Jon Fishman and everyone else. I wanted vindication and I want justice for Jeremy Alex, so I addressed a “Sex Predator Alert” flier to Jon Fishman’s 90 year old father in upstate New York and mailed it to him. That did the trick.
On April 11th, 2016, Jon Fishman went into the Belfast District Court without his lawyer and demanded another fraudulent order of protection, see exhibit L, accusing me of “falsely alleging that I am an untreated sex offender and sexual predator”, which he obviously is. He admitted it under oath at this hearing that he called for. He lost. On that date I was issued a summons, see exhibit M, for a hearing for the unlawful restraining order.
Shortly thereafter, the same morning, I was issued another summons, see exhibit N, and was sued by Jon Fishman for libel and a variety of other false allegations. They asked for punitive damages.
Joe Baiungo then went to the paper with many libelous statements which the Bangor News libelously published prior to the hearing on April 25th, 2016. again, see Exhibit J.
By then Jon Fishman was a national spokesperson for the Democratic Party and Bernie Sanders. This article was obviously slanted and biased against me and towards the pedophile because this was the Bangor News well-known editorial stance. They tried to influence the outcome of the hearing with a very public and nasty character assassination of this very private and sweet old chimney sweep.
As a result of the Bangor News libelous article the now admitted pedophile child-flasher of Touchpants became the keynote speaker at the convention and the people of Maine are unaware of the monster in it’s midst. As a result the child-flasher of Phish is still free to flash the children of Maine on July 6th, 2016.
The hearing for the restraining order was on Monday, April 25th, 2016. Under oath Jon Fishman was shown the photograph Exhibit # 1. Under oath he admitted that it was him. He then admitted knowledge that there were many 100’s of children in the audience, and that this was not an age restricted venue. He then whined “Yeah, but that was 1997”. I then asked him under oath if he was aware that the Supreme Court had overturned the statute of limitations on sex crimes against children, and he went white and stammered “they did?” and “I was not aware of that”.
I had said in open court on the record “Pursuant to the authority granted to me by Maine Revised Statutes 17-A Section 16 Warrantless arrests by private parties, I am placing you under citizen’s arrest for…” and Joe Baiungo started objecting and Judge Spiraco started pounding her gavel saying “There will be no arrests made today.”
I pointed my finger at her and objected “That’s obstruction of justice!”
She said, “You need to calm down because you are winning.”
I objected again “That’s obstruction of justice, your honor”.
Jon Fishman, having admitted to knowing that there were 100’s of children in the audience while holding the photograph Exhibit # 1 in his hands on the witness stand and under oath, is absolute probable cause for the arrest and conviction of Mr. Fishman for the sex crimes, as well as prima facea evidence demonstrating to all that Mike McFadden and Merl Reed are and were in egregious abrogation in their duties as sworn officers of the law, and is certainly probable cause for their arrests.
After hearing Jon Fishman admit to his sex crimes against children under oath, see transcript Exhibit P, Judge Spiraca ruled against Jon Fishman and ruled that I had every right to call him a pedophile which vindicated me for everything all of the way back to the lawful innocence of my first letter, being prima facea evidence of the crimes alleged herein Exhibit O, proof of Fishman, Reed and McFadden’s conspiracy and guilt. The child flasher admitted it under oath in front of three Belfast police and chief Mike McFadden remained silent, which is Official Oppression again on behalf of McFadden on behalf of the wealthy pedophile of Touchpants. The three police officers were duty bound to arrest Fishman as he left the building but had to abrogate their duties, as their boss McFadden monitored their every move from a car just across the street.
They have the profound and absolute obligation under normal circumstances to investigate without bias every detail of every case presented to them before issuing departmental restraining orders and they never once asked or considered affiant’s side of the story. They knew that Fishman was a flasher because this is the first image that turns up in a Google search, and five minutes worth of due diligence would have told the youngest rookie cop that Reed and McFadden were arresting the wrong party, as it’s common published knowledge.
The fact that Mike McFadden tried the 2nd time to do the same crime against me by attempting a second retaliatory arrest after my having given him two years to repent and set his previous error of false arrest is prima facea evidence of his amoral willingness to commit felony upon felony to cover his own tracks.
Exhibit Q is the bail form where I was extorted the $60 bail commissioner’s fee and Exhibit R is one of several unanswered demands for the $60 back, this from DA Geoff Rushlau. Note the bail commissioner Crawley fraudulently neglected to note the $60 fee.
Part 4: Where Jeremy is Now
Earlier this year I met David Linscott, Sr. who seems to know the entire story via both first-hand knowledge and through his late son admitted perpetrator David Linscott, Jr., whom he believes was gunned down because he was going to the police with the entire story including a map to several bodies allegedly drawn by one Bobby Whitcomb following a tour of the property by Jeremy’s alleged killer. This map was allegedly signed by the alleged killer’s alleged mother. The signature on the map is decidedly feminine in stark contrast with the male artist’s that drew the map giving much credence to this map which even tried contour lines and elevations, an impressive drawing, again Exhibit H.
The narrative that I have gleaned and have on video tape from David Linscott seems fairly credible because he himself, like myself and Ted Alex, is the parent of a murdered child seeking justice and his words ring true. You cannot fake a parent’s anguish as he tells how his own son and a Brad Beeton allegedly abducted Jeremy off of the side of the road, and lured him into a truck.
A man would not fabricate his murdered child’s complicity in a murder. His inconsistencies seem confined to those explainable by his dyslexia and just plain getting old
You can not fake a father’s anguish as he describes what these killer’s actions had on his gullible screwed up son who was ultimately killed for his involvement and trying to extricate himself.
Although his narrative is inadmissible hearsay it is corroborated by the maps and any evidence still remaining on the site so it must be told.
All mysteries would disappear with a forensic analysis between the cell and text archives comparisons between the police and the perpetrators, as well as the police logs and 911 tapes.
In essence David Linscott’s narrative goes like this: On Saturday afternoon April 24th, 2004 there was a large BBQ pig roast and auto race at a Hersham’s property on the Back Searsport Road. Overheard on a scanner was the fact that Jeremy Alex had run into Jim Monkeld’s yard. Cameron Philbrook was owed drug money by Jeremy Alex and somehow dispatched several carloads of people with an offer of cash to whoever could bring Jeremy to him. Who was chasing Jeremy at first into the Monkeld’s yard remains a mystery but Merl Reed cannot be ruled out. David Linscott, Jr. and Brad Beeton allegedly found Jeremy and lured him into the car and delivered him to the BBQ pig roast unconscious just before dark. Apparently there was a bonfire for the hundred or so revelers, and a smaller fire back in the woods where the druggies were, and the polite folk stayed away from that area where the bad boys were playing. This is where they took Jeremy; to a small fire with just a few bad dudes. When he woke up they knocked him back out.
They didn’t want to kill him at the pig roast with a hundred people there, nor leave a body at Hersham’s, so they, allegedly with a Fred Barlow, took him to another fire up on Mt. Waldo by the lookout tower. This is where Cameron Philbrook allegedly beat Jeremy to death. His body was left in a very shallow grave within 1500’ of the lookout tower.
This was in very close proximity to Steve McFadden’s house, allegedly. Steve McFadden is a recovering drug addict that was allegedly a colleague of Cameron Philbrook’s in the close-knit drug trade of Waldo County of which Merl Reed and Mike McFadden are intimately involved. Steve McFadden is Mike McFadden’s brother.
More recently Steve McFadden was given a pass of the mandatory blood toxicology screening following his near-fatal car wreck in which alcohol containers were allegedly found.
This is why, when two years later, the Maine State Police had to relieve Reed and McFadden of the Jeremy Alex investigation, that the killer had to re-move Jeremy’s remains; they couldn’t have them found near Steve McFadden’s house by the State Police.
This also explains why the Maine State Police suspended their investigation: the trail led them too near to Detective Stevie McCausland’s colleague from the State Police’s computer crimes division Mike McFadden’s brother; the computer crimes guru that covered for the pedophile of Phish and Touchpants fame with my false imprisonment.
Cameron Philbrook allegedly offered David Linscott, Sr. $3000 to re-move the remains, which he refused, so his son David, Jr., Fred Barlow and Dennis Tripp, Jr. allegedly moved the body in “three buckets of bones” to an undisclosed location.
A complete audio recording of this can be found on You Tube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3p9uvN8dHg .
In Conclusion
Affiant personally interviewed Mr. Jim Monkeld and was informed that the police had never interviewed him and expressed incredulity on his and his wife’s behalf that the police never deemed fit to interview the last two credible witnesses to see Jeremy alive. The Monkeld’s have retired to Texas.
Affiant personally interviewed Mrs. Ames, Mrs. Elwell and Mrs. Harriman, Jeremy’s neighbors that had allegedly seen DJ Linscott Jr. and Brad Beeton on the Saturday afternoon at Jeremy’s house where the officer’s were seen with the billfold. Affiant is the only person to have interviewed them.
This means that these witnesses are all in a clear and present danger but they are left unprotected because it would be in the police’s better interests.
Affiant personally canvassed the neighborhood asking questions. Affiant is the only person to have canvassed the neighborhood.
Affiant inserted himself into the middle of a major homicide investigation and has been literally begging to be interviewed regarding this first-hand knowledge to no avail. The fact that not one official from any police agency has ever taken affiant’s statement is prima facea evidence of a cover-up extending to the highest levels of the Maine state government. Instead he has endured a character assassination with complacency and complicity from even the courts.
Affiant personally heard from Jeremy Alex’s lips that Merl Reed, Mike McFadden, Walter Cory and Bryan Cunningham were using their police powers to stalk him and that he was very afraid of all four, calling them bullies.
Affiant has first hand knowledge that Jeremy Alex had two billfolds
Jeremy Alex kept at least two billfolds in case he was robbed..
Furthermore the affiant sayeth aught.
I would sweat under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true.
The original of this is signed, sealed, notarized and served.

Bradley Paul Williams
58 City Point Rd.
Belfast, Maine 04915